John Locke Government Essay

Without a well-behaved purchase order, all forms of order demoralize to break down. At this point, there truly is no society present. Rather, there is riot and an anarchistic society is non single where the populace croupe be evenhandedly c bed for and protected. John Locke puts frontward umpteen assessments in this regard. However, Locke also understands that the current state of society testament often play a role in terms of how we defend to it. In Richard II, we have a monarchy of a society that fails to be civil in a number of ways. Because of this, action is taken by certain(p) members of the populace.This does raise questions regarding whether or non the actions of these characters in the play plump for or countervail the theories of John Locke as they relate to the civil society. A adjacent examination of the play will promulgate answers in this regard. In the play, we see certain callous and decidedly non salutary thought out actions on the variance of Richard II. In the early lay outs of the play, the major power interferes in a dual between Bolingbroke and Mowbray. The former is banished for 6 years as a result of his actions with the latter is banished forever.This creates great rage among Mowbray and his followers while also consideration the stage for the creation of a honorable enemy. Such actions be further intensify when Richard appropriates all the land of John of nasal for himself when the character passes away. Are such(prenominal) actions those of a convention that professes to oversee a civil society? A great m whatever arguments can be make that such actions are hardly noble in their intent and action. At the core of Lockes writing is that there really is no such thing as a divinity among the nances that rule a picky land.In other words, poofs are not divine beings that can impose their will on the populace in any way they see fit. There are various John Locke, Government, and RICHARD II knave 2 reaso ns why Locke promotes such a feeling. Firstly, he recognizes that kings are human beings and, hence, infirm as all humans are. This can lead to kings being self-serving as opposed to serving their subjects and the rule of police. When two of these components are ignored, the civil society breaks down. Also, it becomes impracticable for tight-laced governance to exist unless secret and serious thought is put forth towards the nature and role of ruling.So, when a king puts forth the attitude that all things are good because of his divine will, society scats the put on the line of collapsing. Why is this so? Mainly, it is because no system of logic is being employed by the principle. Rather, the king believes all things decreed correct because the king is infallible. This does little more than set the stage for the break up of the kings rule as well as the have of the civil society. We can see this in RICHARD II in several ways. Richard slow seems to lose his grip on prop er rule and becomes a self-serving entity.During the events of the play, we break that Richards kingdom is involved in a long, bitter, and protracted war with Ireland. As such, the need for making proper and surgical decisions is a essential. Poor decisions can undermine the effectiveness of the war effort which, in turn, can lead to a go against of the kingdom. Early in the play, Richard is accused of not properly managing the war effort as evidenced by his person-to-person appropriations of hard ups wealth among other improprieties. This sets in motion the idea that he must be disposed as the ruler of the kingdom. John Locke, Government, and RICHARD II Pg 3 musical composition all rulers will be criticized at some point, the most stinging lit crit would be that the leader does not draw the fabric of society together. Rather, he contributes to the collapse of society. An argument of these sorts can be made towards the rule of Richard II. Of great concern to Locke is the n otion that the population has a right to snobbish seat and that any government or ruler that infringes on private spot is little more than a tyranny. In the context of RICHARD II, there is a ruler that has no respect for private property as evidenced by his wrongful seizing of land and wealth.This poses the question when a king acts lawless, is there any law to the land? Locke also was an avowed believer in the notion that government must represent the will of the people. Those governments that do not provide for the populace in such a way will run the risk of being legitimately overthrown by the motivated members of the populace. We see such events play out in RICAHRD II in many different ways. Ultimately, all the actions of mogul Richard promote the notion that he does not serve his subject.Rather, he serves his own personal goals with little regard for the life and property of those he is entrusted to care for. One could avow that RICHARD II truly does provide a clear inte rpretation of the problems with government elaborated in John Lockes consequence TREATISE OF GOVERNMENT. As such, it would be safe to venture that Locke would hardly approve of the way Richard II rules. Considering the downfall of the king in the play, Richard II would have been better served had be been head by Lockes philosophical begin to government.