Miranda v. Arizona essays

Miranda v. Arizona essays The landmark Miranda v Arizona decision was rooted in the case of Ernesto Miranda. On March 13, 1963, a bank worker in Phoenix, Arizona was robbed of $8.00. Police suspected and arrested Ernesto Miranda for the theft. By this arrest, Miranda already had an extensive arrest record, including robbery, burglary, assault and attempted rape and a separate During the two hour questioning, Miranda was not offered a lawyer. During the interrogation, Miranda confessed to the theft of the $8.00. In addition, he also confessed to the kidnapping and the rape of an 18-year- old woman 11 days earlier. This confession was the most important piece of evidence that eventually led to Miranda's conviction for rape. He was Miranda's lawyers appealed the conviction for rape, arguing that Miranda did not understand how the Constitution's Fifth Amendment protected him from self-incrimination. The appeal was unsuccessful at the Arizona Supreme Court and was then heard at the United States Supreme Court. After hearing the arguments, the high court reversed the Arizona court's decision. Ernesto Miranda was granted a new trial, where his confession Despite the lack of a confession, however, Miranda was again convicted of rape and kidnapping on the basis of other evidence. After serving 11 years in jail, Miranda was released on parole in 1972. In 1976, Miranda was fatally stabbed during a fight. In an ironic twist, the suspect in Miranda's murder was read his "Miranda" rights and chose to exercise his The landmark Supreme Court ruling is one of Chief Justice Earl Warren's most famous decisions. In ruling for the defendant, the Warren court held that defendants who were engaged in a "custodial interrogation" like Miranda must be informed of their Fifth Amendment before being ...