Existentialism Essay -- Analysis, Jean-Paul Sartre

In his 1946 es plead Existentialism, Jean-Paul Sartre undertakes the task of defending existentialist philosophy against what he defines as trusts (341) brought against it. Sartre begins to outline the charges brought against existentialism and further, existentialists. Following the medieval quaestio-form, Sartre begins with the avowal of the objection, a short discussion, and then his reply to each. The first of the charges is that of quietism. First, it has been charged with inviting slew to remain in a kind of desperate quietism because, since no solutions argon possible, we should have to consider action in this world as quite an impossible (341). Historically, quietism was a Christian philosophy that advocated withdrawal from worldly activities for peaceable and constant contemplation of God. The Roman Catholic Church officially appointive quietism to be heresy. The Christians then raise the objection that existentialism focuses on the discouragement of the human situat ion and as a result, the philosophy leaves little ambitiousness for action. The next of these objections is that of dwelling on human degradation, with pointing up everywhere the sordid, shady, and slimy, and neglecting the forgiving and beautiful, the bright side of human nature (341) As Sartre explains, the objection is essentially that existentialisms focuses on the evil or dreary side of life.The third charge made against existentialism is that of isolation. (FINISH QUOTE)having ignored human solidarity, with considering man as an uncaring being. (341) The objection is that existentialism ignores human solidarity and examines human beings as individuals. The fourth and final charge laid against existentialism is that of arbitrariness. we are charged w... ...o pass archetype on others, because theres no reason to prefer one(a) configuration to another (360). one can still pass feeling, for, as I have said, one makes a choice in alliance to others. First, one can judge ( and this is perhaps not a judgment of value, nevertheless logical judgment) that certain choices are based on faulting and others on truth (362). The final sub charge is that everything is arbitrary in this choosing of yours. You take something from one pocket and pretend youre putting it into the other. (360) Sartre explains, if Ive discarded God the Father, there has to be someone to invent values, (365) and that to say that we invent values means nothing else but this life has no meaning a priori. Before you come alive, life is nothing its up to you to give it a meaning and value is nothing else but the meaning that you choose (365).