Ethics and Morality

In school of thought we extradite a problem knowing the origin of by decents and defamefulness, on that point ar various theories and ideas unless we do not seem to have a definite answer to this question. By Jamee Ford In tone people atomic number 18 brought up in disparate homes, surrounded by different people and are taught different ways of life. As we put up up we are taught the difference between what is numerateed discipline and what is considered unconventional, which is base on what is soci aloney refreshing.We learn from a young age how we are pass judgment to behave, the rules we have to abide by given from family and the morals we should have and mother up with. In this society it is difficult to find the origin of in good order and prostitute for there are so many theories and ideas, but barely there is no definite answer. I remember worship lights from us citizens, the law, our feelings and our religion give the bounce give a certain indicat ion to how we garment our values, but I belive it is an objective fact that what is said to be legal injury is aggrieve and what is said to be right is right.A minority of people see that faith spots from God. These people have a lot of faith and undertake their morals and understanding of right and wrong from their belief in theology and their bible. For example in the Bible, there are the 10 Commandments, a magnetic dip of what is acceptable and unacceptable according to God. But what if we dont look at in god, where would our sense of right and wrong come from? If we cant change peoples options and feelings on what is right and wrong scantily by saying that it is acceptable or unacceptable, then why is it very well to say God can.Without god, would their still be holiness? Because if god make it acceptable to kill other people, that still wouldnt make it okay, so I believe this possibility is unproven and morality and our right and wrongs cant come from this theory. A nother theory that has brought to the attention of the origin of right and wrong is The Feeling Theory and the Boo-hoorah theory. The feeling theory is an example of how morality does come from us. We make things right or wrong by optimistic or disproving of them. If a mortal has certain feelings about another persons actions, it is saying something about them.If they disprove of an action, it is considered chastely wrong to that person. This theory is people making a claim about what they think they are claiming whether the action is right or wrong. The Boo-Hoorah Theory is another example of how morality comes from us but involves expressing what we think is right or wrong or else than making a claim about it. aroundthing is neither true nor morose and according to this theory there is no fact of the matter unspoilt an expression of what the person observing thinks.The feeling theory and the boo-hoorah theory are both wrong for everyone is different and raised differently w ith different beliefs (everyone has different feelings). So technically one person can unfeignedly believe that it is okay to kill while another says its not okay, these two people are contradicting one another which rules out both theories. Some children are brought up in an abusive home environment does this specify that morally they think its okay to daintiness people differently based on how they were raised?All people are raised in a different environment, under different circumstances so if morality comes from us then morality would have to include a hale lot of different views. Another important theory is that morality and our right and wrongs come from the law. Morality and the law often correspond, our morals are what we consider right and wrong, While the law is what has been decided as right and wrong for us. Both murder and stealing are things we consider morally wrong and are also against the law. In the perfect earth we all requirement the law to coincide with m orality, but in reality most possible will never be like that.For example drugs are immoral and the law will not accept any sort of conduct involving drugs, but in some cases people justify that is morally acceptable to deal drugs use it for personal use because of financial situations and pleasure. So they morally justify it in their own head for it to be okay. Even though morality can be guided by the law, helping us understand the differences between right and wrong, morality cant come from the law, for there are a lot of things the law accept but us civilians see it as wrong.As we can see morality cannot come from the above theories, for they all leave the question of the origin of right and wrong UN answered. I believe that morality comes from us and that things are right and wrong anyway. I believe G. E Moores theory of the extra fact (the vi sense) that can detect wrongness. I truly believe this for it is true that there is that something inside of us, guiding us and helpi ng us know what is right and wrong. We ont necessarily have to be taught about all the wrongs in life to just get that gut feeling that stick up an elderly person is just wrong, why do we feel that? why dont we do it? It is because it is something that is just there. Also everyone in the world is different, we all come from different backgrounds and everyone has been brought up differently, in different environments. So then we all have different feelings and beliefs, for someone can truly believe that stealing is acceptable, when another thinks it is wrong.Morality is based on how you feel and how you treat people, expecting the same in return you wouldnt want someone to cause to be perceived you, so why would you want to hurt them. There are no proven facts to where right and wrong comes from but it is something that is just there. It changes over time, and things that were at a time believed as right are now seen as wrong. So therefore we cannot place judgements for we dont k now what morality and right and wrong will be seen as in ten years time, its based you as a person.